|
Silva (2006) explains that the study of polysemy is not only a phenomenon of linguistic changes, but also of language-in-use, language acquisition and its progress, thought and society. According to Silva, Bréal (1924) believes that polysemy is one of the best responses to the speaker's cognitive and social needs. Also in the use and psychology of the speaker, in the relationship with cognition and in the cultural aspects that must be studied. Furthermore, Bréal (1924) not only created adequate terms for the concept of misnomers, but also laid a theoretical basis for the study of polysemy as events in language, cognition, and culture.
The LC area uses prototype theory to determine the different meanings that a lexical unit has. This shows the argumentation of meanings around the center (prototype) or the lack of well-defined limits. These extensions of meanings are linked to the language in use by different linguistic communities. Silva (2006) clarifies that polysemy is a phenomenon of categorization of prototypes, that is, it is based on prototypes and not on “necessary and sufficient conditions”; which means that the various uses of the object are organized around the center of the prototype and by family resemblances to each other. More explicitly, the structure of the polysemic complex is shaped by several prototypicality effects (GEERAERTS, 1989), this is presented with the different degrees of representation between the senses, organizing the senses according to familiar similarities and overlaps, without precise limits between them . According to Silva (2006, p. 13):
The qualitative dimension of polysemy comprises the various meanings that a word can have and the different relationships that can unite these meanings, namely metaphor, metonymy, generalization and specialization of meaning. Knowing what meanings a word has and how they are semantically related are, therefore, the major qualitative questions of polysemy.
Polysemic studies are based on the diachronic phenomenon and these are well received in the theoretical framework of cognitive linguistics. The concept of polysemy [b][url=https://dbtodata.com/phone-number-data/]Phone Number Data[/url][/b] illustrates the transformation of image schemes, metaphorical and metonymic models. Silva (2006) explains that the study of polysemy is not only a phenomenon of linguistic changes, but also of language in use, language acquisition and its progress, thought and society. According to Silva (2006), Bréal believes that polysemy is one of the best responses to the speaker's cognitive and social needs.
Also in the use and psychology of the speaker, in the relationship with cognition and in the cultural aspects that must be studied. Furthermore, Bréal not only created adequate terms for the concept of misnomers, but also laid a theoretical basis for the study of polysemy as events in language, cognition, and culture. Silva (2006) explains that the schematic network model has two categorizations, by scheme and by prototypes.
The schema abstracts what is common to your instance. Which means that the instance has acquired the specifications of the schema, but expands them in more detail in this network of meanings. According to Silva (2006), the seduction of cognitive linguistics by polysemy, its tendency towards polysemic analysis in terms of schematic networks and radial networks, were popularized by (1987) and Lakoff (1987), with the tendency to postulate identical mental representations.
3. METHODOLOGY
The investigation begins with the collection of the lexicographic corpus of the printed dictionaries (2009) and (2010) and the online dictionary (2015). Secondly, we continued with the survey of the linguistic corpus on the platform and on the 'letras.com' website. All collected data will be organized and placed in the attachments section. Afterwards, the light item will be analyzed and compared based on the three dictionaries mentioned above.
[b][url=https://dbtodata.com/phone-number-data/][img]http://zh-cn.phonenumberth.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Phone-Number-Data.png[/img][/url][/b]
Next, we will proceed with the analysis and comparison of the corpus chosen from and the samba-lyrics. It was decided to limit this part to the Samba School of Beija-Flor de , since there are many schools in Brazil and we only need to analyze the existence of occurrences of the item 'light' in the lyrics of the sambas from that school. To conclude, we will make several proposals for a network of meanings for the item under study and will be placed in the annexes.
4. RESULTS, DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
4.1 PRESENTATION, DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF THE CORPUS OF LEXICOGRAPHIC DATA
In the first analysis, we aimed to identify the different polysemic meanings of the item 'light'. Therefore, this initial analysis presents the lexicographic corpus established by data collected in the dictionaries Houaiss (2009), Aurélio (2010) and Michaelis (2015). Consulting dictionaries allows us to identify that the research word has a high level of polysemy. Later we will use the cognitive mechanisms of specification, generalization, metaphor and metonymy to detail the polysemy of the item 'light'. In Houaiss (2009), we find a date of 1041 for the noun 'light', unlike the other two dictionaries in which the information is not available. The etymology of the lexeme 'light' is referenced as originating from Latin: Lūx , lūcis : 'light, clarity, illumination, day'. Therefore, 'light' is linked to 'clarity', 'illumination' and 'day'.
In dictionaries, the meaning that corresponds to the first entry of the entries defines the lexical item 'light' in Aurélio (2010) as “electromagnetic radiation capable of causing visual sensation in a normal observer” and in Michaelis (2015) as “portion of electromagnetic radiation to which the organs of vision react.” In the Houaiss dictionary (2009), it was found that the initial entry differs from the first two mentioned above. Houaiss (2009) defines 'light' as “capacity of vision” and agrees with the first definition by Aurélio (2010) and Michaelis (2015) in entry number twenty.
So, we identify the prototypical meaning as “Electromagnetic radiation capable of causing visual sensation in a normal observer”. From the prototype, we find several expressions that can be classified in the sense of generalization , such as : 'natural light', 'reflected light', 'light from celestial bodies', 'artificial light', and 'light sources'. The word 'light' can be found in several expressions that present a specification process : 'sunlight' and 'daylight' which in Astronomy is identified as the lighting that comes from the sun.
In the specification, expressions such as 'starlight' and 'moonlight' are also present, referring to the light that celestial bodies diffuse, either their own or reflected. In the case of 'moonlight', it is the light reflected from the sun. In addition, we have other expressions with this sense of specificity: 'The light of the bonfire' 'The light of the lamp' here we find the interpretation of clarity produced by different things such as: bonfire, lamp, among others.
_________________
Phone Number Data
|
Вход
Регистрация
Альбомы
FAQ
